International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

February 07, 2008 

New Approach to Antiboycott Settlements? BIS Waives Penalties in Exchange for Ceasing Exports to Boycotting Countries

By Douglas N. Jacobson and Laura Martino

In what appears to be a new twist in the settlement of antiboycott enforcement cases, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently agreed to waive civil penalties against two U.S. distributors of medical products for violating the antiboycott regulations if the companies agreed to refrain from participating in any export transaction to certain countries in the Middle East.

In the first case, BIS alleged that New York-based AR-AM Medical Services LLC (AR-AM) violated the antiboycott regulations. Specifically, BIS alleged that AR-AM committed three violations of the antiboycott regulations by furnishing information concerning its or another entity’s business relationship with a boycotted country to the National Bank of Egypt. The information furnished to the bank included declarations that the exported goods were not Israeli-origin goods and did not include Israeli-origin material.

According to the terms of the settlement agreement, BIS agreed to suspend the $7,200 civil penalty against AR-AM for two years if the company agreed to refrain from participating in any export transaction involving Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen for two years.

In a similar case, BIS agreed to suspend a $2,400 civil penalty against New York-based DMA Med-Chem Corporation (DMA) (While not indicated in the agreements, DMA and AR-AM appear to be affiliated). According to BIS, DMA allegedly provided documents to the Bank of Egypt about business relationships with boycotted countries in connection with the sale of products to Syria. The documents included statements that certain goods were not Israeli-origin.

According to the terms of the settlement agreement, BIS agreed to suspend the penalty for two years on the condition that DMA refrained from participating in any export transactions involving Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen.

These companies will avoid having to pay these penalties if they comply with the settlement conditions for the next two years. Of course, the downside to this settlement approach is that these two companies can no longer make sales to the countries named above for two years (although sales of medical devices to Syria, of course, currently require a BIS license) and the company names now appear on BIS's Denied Persons List. In fact, today BIS published in the Federal Register the "non-standard" Orders denying AR-AM and DMA's export privileges until January 14, 2010. The denial orders for each case can be found here and here.

The antiboycott provisions contained in Part 760 of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain requirements of unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including providing information about business relationships with another person who is known or believed to be restricted from having a business relationship with or in a boycotting country. In addition, the antiboycott regulations require "U.S. persons" to report the receipt of certain boycott requests to the Department of Commerce.

Note: In what appears to be a related case, BIS imposed a $22,500 civil penalty against the National Bank of Egypt in January 2007, for furnishing information concerning another person's business relations with a boycotted country.

Labels:

July 23, 2007 

BIS Publishes Final Antiboycott Penalty Guidelines, Provides Guidance on Licensing Jurisdiction of Microelectronic Circuits and Announces CCL Review

On July 17, 2007, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published the following three important final rules and notices in the Federal Register:

Antiboycott Penalty Guidelines:

The first document published by BIS in the July 17, 2007 edition of the Federal Register was a final rule setting forth BIS policy concerning voluntary self-disclosures of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the factors that BIS will consider when deciding whether to pursue administrative charges and impose penalties for violations of the antiboycott provisions.

Specifically, the final rule creates a new section 764.8 of the EAR (15 CFR § 764.8) setting forth the procedures for voluntary self disclosure of violations of the antiboycott provisions. For example, section 764.8 requires, among other things, that voluntary self-disclosures be in writing and that they be received by BIS's Office of Antiboycott Compliance before the agency learns of the same or substantially similar information from ‘‘another source’’ and has commenced an investigation or inquiry in connection with that information. Significantly, the final rule specifies that violations revealed by exporters to BIS in telephone or e-mail requests for advice concerning the antiboycott provisions are "not information received from another source". The final rule states that a voluntary self-disclosure of a violation of the antiboycott provisions of the EAR will be considered to be a "Great Weight" mitigating factor in the settlement of administrative enforcement cases.

The final rule also creates a new supplement No. 2 to part 764 that describes how BIS responds to violations of the antiboycott provisions and how BIS makes penalty determinations in the settlement of antiboycott administrative enforcement cases. The rule also specifies the various factors that BIS considers to be important when settling antiboycott administrative enforcement cases.

The final antiboycott guidelines rule takes effect on August 16, 2007.

Guidance on Licensing Jurisdiction of Microelectronic Circuits:

BIS also published a final rule in the July 17, 2007 Federal Register adding language to ECCN 3A001 advising that the following are subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC):

Radiation hardened microelectronic circuits controlled by Category XV(d) of the United States Munitions List (USML) and all specifically designed or modified systems or subsystems, components, parts, accessories, attachments, and associated equipment controlled by Category XV(e) of theUSML.
On the same date, DDTC published a Federal Register notice amending the text of the USML Category XV(d) to clarify the coverage of and to alter one of the five performance characteristics that define radiation-hardened microelectronic circuits that are subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

CCL Review:

On July 17, 2007 BIS published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that it is conducting a "systematic review" of the Commerce Control List (CCL) and is seeking comments from the public on the following topics:
  1. The overall structure of the CCL, including suggestions for how the structure of the CCL may be changed to better advance U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economic interests;
  2. Types of items that should be listed on the CCL and the appropriate levels of controls to be placed on those items, taking into account technology levels, markets, and foreign availability;
  3. Any updates to the CCL item descriptions that would enable the descriptions to better reflect the intent of the multinational controls and to eliminate any overly broad descriptions that inadvertently capture non-critical items that are not controlled by other countries; and
  4. Coordination and harmonization of controls on items covered by the multilateral regimes, such as the Wassenaar Arrangement.
This is an excellent opportunity for companies and industries that produce and export controlled products to advise BIS of their concerns with specific Export Classification Control Numbers (ECCNs) and other CCL concerns. Comments on the CCL must be submitted to BIS by September 17, 2007.

Labels: , ,

May 16, 2007 

BIS Imposes $27,000 Civil Penalty on Foreign Subsidiary of U.S. Company for Violating Antiboycott Regulations

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced today that Cooper Tools Industrial Ltda. (CTIL), a wholly-owned Brazilian subsidiary of Cooper U.S., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, agreed to pay a $27,000 civil penalty to settle allegations it committed fifteen violations of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations.

In its charging letter, BIS's Office of Antiboycott Compliance alleged that CTIL furnished fifteen items of prohibited information about business relationships with Israel to persons in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

BIS stated that CTIL voluntarily disclosed the transactions and cooperated fully with the subsequent investigation.

This is the third antiboycott penalty imposed by BIS in 2007.

Labels: ,

April 26, 2007 

Syria Hosts Israel Boycott Conference

The Jerusalem Post reports today that "representatives of 14 Arab states convened in Damascus this week for a four-day gathering aimed at strengthening the economic and trade boycott of Israel."The article states that the conference, "which began on Monday, is being held under the auspices of the Arab League and brings together regional liaison officers from participating Arab countries. It marks the fourth time the boycott officers have met in the past 18 months."

According to the article, t
he conference participants include "Syria, Sudan, Algeria, the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Libya, Lebanon, Qatar, the Palestinian Authority, Tunisia and Yemen." Egypt and Jordan, which have signed peace treaties with Israel, are not participating in the conference.

Labels:

April 20, 2007 

Members of Congress Criticize Saudi Arabia for Enforcing Israel Boycott

Three members of Congress have criticized Saudi Arabia following the report in Monday's Jerusalem Post that Saudi Arabia continues to enforce the primary boycott of Israeli goods.

Friday's edition of the Jerusalem Post contains quotes from Representatives Howard Berman (D-CA), Joseph Crowley (D-CT) and Mike Pence (R-IN) that are strongly critical of Saudi Arabia for continuing the boycott, despite their agreement to terminate the boycott during the WTO accession process. The three members of Congress
called for Saudi Arabia to end their boycott immediately.

The article also quotes an official from the U.S Trade Representative's Office that:

"At the time of its accession to the WTO, Saudi Arabia did not invoke the nonapplication provisions of the WTO Agreement with respect to any member, and therefore has taken on all WTO rights and obligations, including most-favored-nation treatment, with respect to all members, including Israel."

In our view," the official said, "continuing the primary boycott of Israel would not be consistent with these commitments."

Labels: ,

April 16, 2007 

Saudi Arabia Continues to Enforce Boycott of Israel

Monday's Jerusalem Post reports that "despite a promise made to Washington nearly 18 months ago" Saudi Arabia continues to enforce the Arab League boycott of Israel and "bar entry to products manufactured in Israel or to foreign-made goods containing Israeli components."

The article quotes a number of Saudi customs officials as stating that "goods made in Israel are not allowed here in Saudi Arabia . . . ." Another Saudi customs official said if a good "is made in Israel, then it is not allowed here in Saudi Arabia. If it is made in any other country, then no problem. But not from Israel." The article states that "Israeli-made goods would be confiscated upon arrival" in Saudi Arabia.

The article notes that U.S. officials "continue to raise the boycott issue with their Saudi counterparts" and that U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab recently wrote a letter to Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR) confirming that continued Saudi enforcement of the Israel boycott would "not be in keeping" with Riyadh's WTO commitments.

Labels: ,

January 24, 2007 

BIS Issues Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) today posted on its website the agency's Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report. The 2006 Annual Report contains a great deal of useful information and statistics on export licensing, export enforcement and antiboycott reporting.

The PDF version of the 2006 Annual Report can be found at the following link.

Labels: , ,

January 21, 2007 

BIS Imposes $22,000 Antiboycott Penalty on National Bank of Egypt

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has imposed a $22,000 civil penalty on the National Bank of Egypt's New York Branch (NBE) for violating the antiboycott regulations. Specifically, BIS alleged that the NBE committed four violations of the antiboycott regulations by providing commercial invoices to a trading company in Syria that contained prohibited negative certificate of origin clauses. In addition, BIS charged NBE with four additional violations for failing to maintain records for five years. The proposed charging letter, settlement agreement and order can be found here.

The warning letters issued during 2006 by the Office of Antiboycott Compliance can be at the following link.

Labels: ,

January 07, 2007 

Treasury Publishes List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International Boycott

The January 8, 2007 edition of the Federal Register contains the Treasury Department's periodic "List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International Boycott." The list of countries includes: Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Republic of Yemen. The notice states that "Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury." This list is unchanged from the previous version published by Treasury in October 2006.

Labels: ,

November 05, 2006 

Arab States Step Up Boycott Activity Against Israel

The Jerusalem Post reports that "despite the public perception that the Arab trade embargo of Israel is on the wane, the number of boycott-related requests made to US companies this year by Arab states has registered a sharp increase." The article, which examines recent data issued by the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), indicates that the number of boycott-related requests submitted to BIS in 2006 is "nearly 20 percent over the rate recorded last year." The article notes that the largest number of boycott requests came from the United Arab Emirates, followed by Syria.

The antiboycott provisions of the U.S.
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR Part 760) prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in certain activity relating to restrictive trade practices and unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including implementing letters of credit containing prohibited boycott terms or conditions and entering into agreements containing prohibited boycott language. The antiboycott provisions also require U.S. persons to report quarterly requests they have received to take certain actions to comply with, further or support an unsanctioned foreign boycott.

Labels: , ,

July 23, 2006 

International Trade Law News Roundup

Antidumping/Countervailing Duties

A three judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (Chief Judge Restani and Judges Barzilay and Eaton) issued an opinion on Friday that will certainly complicate the softwood lumber settlement agreement negotiated between the U.S. and Canada. In Tembec, Inc., et al. v. United States, Chief Judge Restani and Judges Barzilay and Eaton held that the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) improperly continued to enforce antidumping and countervailing duty orders on softwood lumber from Canada following the implementation of an affirmative injury determination issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) pursuant to section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ("URAA").

On June 18, 2006, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that terminating the antidumping suspension agreement that limits imports of Russian uranium products would materially injure the U.S. uranium industry. By a 4-1 vote, the ITC's Commissioners found that lifting the 1992 Russian suspension agreement would likely cause material injury to the U.S. industry, which include, among others, USEC Inc., the only U.S. producer of enriched uranium fuel for nuclear power plants; ConverDyn, the sole U.S. uranium converter; and Power Resources and Crow Butte Resources, the two largest uranium mining companies in the U.S.

Cuba

The recently released second report of the U.S. Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba can be found here. The report includes the following recommendations for assistance and programs the U.S. can offer to advance freedom and democracy in Cuba, including $80 million over two years to increase support for Cuban civil society, expand international awareness, break the regime's information blockade and continue developing assistance initiatives to help Cuba realize a democratic transition. The House International Relations Commmittee's Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere will hold a hearing on the Cuba Commission report on July 27, 2006.

Customs

The Customs Electronic Bulletin Board (CEBB) has officially been retired. A complete description of where the items on the CEBB can now be found on CBP's website is located at: www.customs.gov/xp/cgov/import/communications_to_trade/cebb_linklist.xml.

The minutes of the May 20, 2006 Departmental Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (COAC) have been posted on the CBP website. Among other things, the minutes state that 32% of C-TPAT members have been validated and 154 C-TPAT members are included in Tier 3.

On July 25, 2006, the Subcommittee on Trade of the Committee on Ways and Means will hold a hearing on budget authorizations for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 for the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of DHS, and on other Customs issues. The hearing will also address other Customs issues, including: the creation of CBP and ICE and the integration of the former U.S. Customs Service into DHS, the C-TPAT program, Customs automation and modernization efforts and the mechanisms needed to fund them, as well as general Customs oversight issues.

Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Max Baucus (D-MT) recently introduced the Customs and Trade Facilitation Reauthorization Act of 2006 (S. 3658). Among other things, the Customs and Trade Facilitation Reauthorization Act provides for the following:

  • Requires, within one year, an assessment of nonintrusive container scanning in foreign ports;
  • Adds CBP personnel at all U.S. ports of entry;
  • Requires enhanced cargo targeting and analysis to facilitate trade and restart the movement of cargo following a transportation disruption;
  • Requires the Commissioner of Customs to develop a trade resumption plan, which must be routinely exercised with federal, state, local officials and private stakeholders;
  • Authorizes the negotiation of bilateral customs partherships (such as the Container Security Initiative) with foreign governments to facilitate safer U.S.-bound trade;
  • Authorizes a Customs Industry Partnership Program (including the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) to facilitate safer trade; the program shall offer benefits to qualifying customs users who use secure business systems and meet appropriate physical security requirements;
  • Requires a one-portal government-wide system to collect mandatory import and export clearance documentation;
  • Adds personnel for Treasury Department oversight of delegated customs functions carried out by the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection;
  • Adds resources for trade facilitation and enforcement, such as increasing the number of CBP import specialists, adding personnel for FTA implementation and enforcement; and restoring and adding personnel to conduct customs violations investigations at ICE;
  • Creates a New CBP Intellectual Property Rights Division, director and staff, including co-location of an ICE investigative liaison;
  • Streamlines and automates claim and collection of customs duty drawback
Export Controls

In a hearing held last week on the proposed sale of F-16 aircraft and weapons systems to Pakistan, Representatives Henry Hyde (R-IL) and Tom Lantos (D-CA), the chairman and ranking member of the House International Relations Committee, strongly criticized the State Department or ignoring congressional oversight on arms sales and their risk to national security. Representative Hyde said "that a sequence of actions and inactions by the State Department recently resulted in a host of serious national security and compliance issues." "The State Department cannot persuasively justify its position even now. This Committee is determined to take all appropriate action in order to ensure that there will not be a recurrence of this flouting of Congress' role", he added. As a result, Representatives Lantos and Hyde have introduced H.R. 5847, a bill that requires quarterly updates on possible upcoming arms sales and enforces a 20-day consultation period before the State Department formally notifies Congress of a proposed sale. In introducing the legislation, Congressman Lantos said that the "Department of State chose to exploit the proposed sale of sophisticated F-16 aircraft and weaponry to Pakistan as the unfortunate vehicle to overturn what had been a constructive process to ensure that arms sales do not compromise U.S. national security." Lantos added "while I support the substance of the sale, we have had long-standing concerns over the security plan to protect the U.S. technology in these aircraft and missiles in sales to a country that produced the A.Q. Khan nuclear proliferation network. In the Department's rush to reduce Congressional oversight, our concerns have not been heeded. Make no mistake, they will."

The feud between Boeing and Airbus has now spilled over to discussions over compliance with export controls and other laws. The Seattle Times reports that Ralph Crosby, the top U.S. executive for Airbus' parent company, EADS, recently stated that Boeing Chairman and Chief Executive James McNerney was "just patently wrong" when he stated that EADS isn't subject to burdensome U.S. regulatory requirements, such as the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Crosby said that "EADS is the largest single purchaser of U.S. aerospace parts, buying $8.5 billion worth in 2005. On those parts as well, 'we're governed by ITAR.'" He also said that "EADS operates by a strong code of conduct and quite frankly we find it unusual to have it suggested otherwise."

Free Trade Agreements

By a vote of 221-205, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 5864, legislation that would implement the U.S.-Oman Free Trade Agreemen. Senate leaders are trying to reach agreement to pass the House bill before the August congressional recess. The trade benefits of the Oman FTA will be fairly small since bilateral trade between Oman and the U.S. amounted to only $1 billion, about 0.04% of all U.S. trade. The FTA would eliminate tariffs immediately on nearly all industrial and consumer products, except certain textiles and apparel, and on 87% of U.S. agricultural exports to Oman. The committee report (H. Rept. 109-574), that accompanies H.R. 5684, states that "Oman has reiterated its commitment to not enforce any aspect of a boycott on Israel, in letters on September 28,2005 and June 15,2006" and "in June 2006 Oman issued an official government circular to its relevant agencies reiterating this policy and commitment."

By a vote of 23-13, House Ways and Means Committee last week approved draft legislation to implement the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement (PTPA). The PTPA would immediately remove the duties on 80% of U.S. exports of consumer and industrial products to Peru and more than two-thirds of current U.S. farm exports to Peru. Bilateral trade between the U.S. and Peru was $7.4 billion during 2005, with $2.3 billion of this coming from U.S. exports.

OFAC

OFAC has recently issued a Statement of Licensing Policy that establishes a favorable licensing regime through which U.S. persons can request OFAC approval of participation in projects in support of the Iranian people and their aspirations for freedom. The types of activities that OFAC will consider licensing, on a case-by-case basis, include conferences and training programs aimed at supporting democracy, human rights, and democratic institutions; educational, sports, and cultural exchanges; and independent media and environmental programs designed to benefit the Iranian people.

OFAC has recently published a set of guidelines on transactions with the Palestinian Authority. The guidelines explain the scope of OFAC sanctions against the Palestinian Authority and describe OFAC's specific licensing policy with respect to transactions with the Palestinian Authority.

OFAC has named two additional Iranian companies, Sanam Industrial Group and Ya Mahdi Industries Group, to the List of Iranian Weapons Proliferators under Executive Order 13382. These entities are owned or controlled by, or act or purport to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, the Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO), a subsidiary of the Iranian Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics. AIO manages and coordinates Iran's missile program and oversees all of Iran's missile industries. These entities have been added to OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals with the program designation "NPWMD".

World Trade Organization

The chairperson of the WTO's Vietnam’s membership negotiations announced that he hopes to secure final agreement on Vietnam's accession to the WTO at the General Council meeting in October 2006. The remaining items that need to be completed include obtaining more factual information from the Vietnamese on certain issues, work between Vietnam and its negotiating partners to clarify some parts of the schedules of commitments;and further policy decisions to be taken by the Government of Vietnam.

Labels: ,

June 23, 2006 

Saudi Ambassador to U.S. Admits Boycott of Israel Still in Force

The Jerusalem Post reports that Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the U.S. recently acknowledged for the first time that Saudi Arabia continues to enforce the primary boycott of Israel. According to the Post, during a question and answer session following a "policy lunch" organized by the Brookings Institution, Saudi Ambassador Prince Turki al-Faisal was asked to describe the steps taken by the Saudi government to dismantle its boycott of Israel. "According to a transcript obtained by the Post, the ambassador responded by saying that his government had informed American officials, 'that we have removed the secondary and tertiary boycotts' of Israel, which prohibit trade with companies that operate in Israel or have ties to such firms" but "the primary boycott is an issue of national sovereignty guaranteed within the makeup of the WTO and its rules." The Jerusalem Post also reports that Ambassador al-Faisal said at the program that "he had personally informed American officials of the Saudi intention to maintain the primary boycott of Israel."

As the Post article correctly notes, the admission that Saudi Arabia continues to enforce the primary boycott of Israel contradicts Saudi Arabia's previous pledge to the U.S. made during the bilateral negotiations on issues related to Saudi Arabia's World Trade Organization (WTO) accession. For example, former U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Rob Portman advised the House Ways and Means Committee in February that the boycott issue was a "big concern" because WTO rules require Saudi Arabia to provide nondiscriminatory treatment for all WTO members, including Israel. Portman said that "we have raised this with officials there in Saudi Arabia. We've received assurances from Saudi Arabia. They will abide by their WTO commitments." Similarly, during her confirmation, USTR Susan Schwab told the Senate Finance Committee that Saudi Arabia "was abiding by its pledge to end the boycott" of Israel.

Labels:

June 12, 2006 

Senator Bingaman Seeks Closer Monitoring of Boycott Compliance by USTR

Following the Jerusalem Post's recent series of articles that Arab countries continue to enforce the boycott of Israel despite assurances to the contrary, Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), the Ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee's International Trade Subcommittee, has joined the growing members of Congress that have voiced their dissatisfaction with the U.S. Trade Representative's (USTR) efforts to assess boycott compliance by Arab countries.

The Jerusalem Post reports today that Senator Bingaman
has advised "USTR that they need to do a better job of determining the level of compliance of countries that have made commitments to the United States not to participate in the Arab League boycott." Bingaman also said that, while he is currently inclined to give the USTR "an opportunity" to improve its reporting mechanism on the Arab boycott, he did not rule out the possibility of introducing legislation in order to bring about change.

Labels:

June 08, 2006 

Oman Customs Official: "No, no. Products from Israel are not permitted because of the boycott"

In his continuing series of articles on the Arab boycott of Israel, Jerusalem Post reporter Michael Freund reports today that the Government of Oman continues to prohibit Israeli-made goods from entering the country. The article notes that only "five months after signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the U.S., Oman continues to restrict the import of Israeli-made goods despite a pledge made to the U.S. that it would not boycott the Jewish state." The article quotes Oman's most senior customs official as saying: "No, no. Products from Israel are not permitted because of the boycott" and "if someone brings products from Israel, they will be confiscated." The customs official added that "even catalogs of commercial products that mention Israel would likely be seized by Omani customs authorities."

In the January 16, 2006 press release announcing the signing of the U.S.-Oman FTA, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative stated that "Oman does not apply the Arab League boycott of Israel nor does it have any law establishing the primary, secondary or tertiary boycott of Israel." House and Senate Committees have recently voted in favor of approving the U.S.-Oman FTA.

The Jerusalem Post has reported that the White House and Congress are not pleased that Bahrain, Iraq and Saudi Arabia continue to enforce the boycott of Israel despite their promises to the contrary.

Labels:

June 04, 2006 

Jerusalem Post Boycott Articles Having Impact in Washington

The Jerusalem Post's recent series of articles on the Arab boycott of Israel is having an impact in Washington. Sunday's Jerusalem Post reported that, following last week's article describing Saudi Arabia's ongoing enforcement of the boycott of Israel, Congressman Mike Ferguson (R-NJ) has called Saudi Arabia's boycott-related policies "unacceptable" and that he has announced that he will raise the boycott issue with senior Bush administration officials.

The Jerusalem Post article quotes Congressman Ferguson as stating that "my colleagues and I raised a number of concerns last year about Saudi Arabia joining the World Trade Organization (WTO), including their participation in the Arab boycott of Israel" and "now that the Saudis have joined the WTO . . . "we are finding is that they are not following the rules."

When asked to comment on the Jerusalem Post's article describing how Saudi customs officials advised that Israeli-origin goods are not permitted in Saudi Arabia, a U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) spokesman said that "Saudi officials have affirmed on several occasions, at meetings in Washington and in Riyadh, and in written correspondence, that they understand their WTO commitments and that they will abide by them." In addition, the article quotes a State Department spokesperson as stating that the U.S. has "raised this issue directly with senior Saudi officials on several occasions. In all instances, we have received assurances that Saudi Arabia understands and remains committed to their WTO obligations, including the obligation to treat all WTO members according to WTO rules."

Stay tuned, as evidence mounts that Bahrain, Iraq, Oman and Saudi Arabia continue to enforce the primary boycott of Israel, despite their promises to Washington.

Labels:

May 30, 2006 

Is Saudi Arabia Still Enforcing Arab Boycott of Israel?

In it continuing series of articles on the Arab boycott of Israel, today's Jerusalem Post reports that Saudi Arabia continues to prohibit Israeli-made goods from entering the country. The story cites several examples of Saudi officials confirming that Israeli-made goods are not permitted to enter Saudi Arabia. For example, the article quotes a Saudi customs official as stating that "there is still a ban on Israeli products, and anything declared as coming from Israel will not be allowed." The official added that "some people may try to say that a product was made elsewhere, but if there is anything which shows it was made in Israel, then it is a problem."

The article notes that the "Saudi position appears to contradict assurances given last week by US Deputy Trade Representative Susan Schwab. In written responses to questions raised by members of the Senate Finance Committee, Schwab said that Saudi Arabia had told Washington that it was abiding by its pledge to end the boycott of the Jewish state."

Separately, UPI reports that the
Saudi Ministry of Health is "investigating the possibility of infiltration of medical equipment manufactured in Israel to the Saudi market."

Saudi Arabia, along with
Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Yemen, appear on the most recent version of the Treasury Department's "List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International Boycott," which was last updated in December 2004.

Labels:

May 25, 2006 

Israel Opts Not to Challenge Arab Boycott at WTO

Jerusalem Post reporter Michael Frend has written another original and interesting story relating to the Arab boycott of Israel. The story, published, in today's edition of the Jerusalem Post, notes that despite its "decade-old membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO), which aims to liberalize international commerce, Israel has never filed a formal complaint against the Arab boycott of the Jewish state, nor does it have any plans to do so in the immediate future." Rather, the paper reports, "Israel has opted for what one government official in Jerusalem termed 'a more discreet method to try and open channels of communication,' maintaining that a behind-the-scenes approach would ultimately prove more effective in contending with the embargo." The article notes that "U.S. officials have publicly stated if an Arab country were to enforce a boycott against Israe, the Jewish state would be entitled to take the matter up with the WTO, and that Washington would likely back such a move."

Labels:

May 19, 2006 

U.S. Fumes as Iraq Sends Representative to Arab League Boycott Conference

Michael Freund of the Jerusalem Post reports that the interim Government of Iraqi sent a representative to this week's meeting of the Arab League Boycott Office in Syria. Needless to say, the Bush Administration and Congress were not pleased. The article quotes a State Department spokesman as saying "we are disappointed by the decision of the Iraqi government to attend this meeting, and will be noting our concerns with Iraqi officials." The spokesman noted that the U.S. "has raised this issue with Iraqi officials in the past and expect to raise it with them again."

U.S. exporters doing business with Iraq should closely review tenders and other trade-related documents to ensure that they do not contain prohibited boycott language.

Labels:

May 18, 2006 

Trade News and Notes

  • The latest news on the long-delayed mandatory AES final rule is that a stalemate still exists between the Census Bureau and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) over certain provisions of the final rule. The issues of concern still remain CBP's quest to eliminate or restrict Option 4 (post-departure) filing and CBP's insistence that it be able to share AES data with foreign governments. The two agencies are apparently not close to reaching a solution to this impasse.
  • CBP recently held its quarterly meeting of the Commercial Operations Advisory Committee (COAC). During the meeting, CBP officials said that they are planning to hire nearly 90 import specialists, as the number of import specialists has declined nearly 10% since U.S. Customs was moved from Treasury to DHS. Regarding C-TPAT, while CBP has completed more than 1,900 validations, the agency still needs to conduct more than 2,200 validations. More than 140 applicants have been suspended from C-TPAT due to failed validations or for engaging in illegal activity. CBP now appears to accept the proposal currently pending in Congress to allow private third-party validators.
  • The Spring 2006 edition of Region Focus, a quarterly business magazine published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, contains an article entitled "Trade Wars." The article notes that many U.S. products, from steel to wooden bedroom furniture, are protected by antidumping duties, economists say antidumping cases are often misused.
  • Bloomberg reports that AWB Ltd., the Australian company that oversees the exports of wheat, admitted making illegal payments for inland transportation and after sales service to the Government of Iran in violation of the U.N.'s Oil-for-Food Program.
  • This morning, NPR's Marketplace carried a story on the Bureau of Industry and Security's proposal to impose restrictions on commercial exports to China if they are intended for a military end-use. The story notes many U.S. companies worry that the proposal will cause them to lose business to companies in other countries. You can listen to the story by clicking here.
  • The U.S. Trade Representative today submitted a report to Congress on U.S. Trade and Investment Policy Toward Sub-Saharan Africa and Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) with respect to sub-Saharan Africa.
  • The USTR released a letter from Bahrain's ambassador to the U.S. stating "In the hope of advancing peace and regional cooperation, the Kingdom of Bahrain recognized the need to dismantle the primary boycott of Israel and despite recent press accounts, the Boycott of Israel Office is closed." Click here to see related story.
  • State Department publishes certification that Cuba, Iran, North Korean, Syria and Venezuela are not cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism efforts.
  • The Transportation Security Administration has issued the long-awaited Air Cargo Final Rule. Among other things, the final rule will require employees of freight forwarders to attend TSA security training courses. Freight forwarders will also have to develop security plans and have them approved by TSA. The final rule will be published in the Federal Register in the coming days.

Labels:

May 16, 2006 

Arab League Holding Boycott Conference/Congressman Asks Administration to Investigate Bahrain's Boycott Activities

The 76th conference on the Arab League boycott of Israel is taking place this week in Damascus, Syria. Fourteen of the 22 Arab League countries sent representatives to the four-day meeting that is intended to strengthen the Arab boycott of Israel.

Although Bahrain did not sent a delegate to the boycott conference, Representative Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee recently called for the Bush Administration to investigate whether Bahrain has followed through on its committment to end its boycott of Israel. Congress approved the U.S.-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement only after receiving pledges from the Government of Bahrain that it had eliminated all aspects of the secondary and tertiary Arab League Boycott of Israel and intended to dismantle the primary boycott of Israel. There have been recent conflicting reports, however, as to whether Bahrain has actually ended its boycott of Israel. For example, the Jerusalem Post recently reported that Bahrain has yet to close its boycott office.

Labels:

May 10, 2006 

BIS Imposes $13,500 on Bank for Antiboycott-Related Violations

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has imposed a $13,500 penalty on the New York branch of BNP Paribas for antiboycott related violations. BIS's Office of Antiboycott Compliance alleged that BNP Paribas committed three violations of the antiboycott regulations (15 CFR Part 760) by forwarding bills of lading and a carrier's certificate containing prohibited boycott language to the bank's affiliates in Dubai and Bahrain. In addition, BIS charged the bank with violating the antiboycott regulations by failing to report the receipt of the three requests to take an action that would have the effect of furthering or supporting a restrictive trade practice or unsanctioned foreign boycott.

Labels: ,

October 16, 2005 

Alcoa Europe SA Enters in Settlement Agreement Over Failure to Report of Antiboycott Requests


Alcoa Europe SA (AESA) of Lausanne, Switzerland recently entered into an agreement with the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in which it agree to pay $6,000 to settle charges that the company failed to report certain antiboycott requests received by the company in connection with sales to the Middle East. BIS alleged that AESA committed six violations the U.S. Antiboycott Regulations for failing to report the receipt of a request to engage in Restrictive Trade Practice or Foreign Boycott in connection with six transactions involving the sale and/or transfer of goods from the United States to Dubai.

Specifically, AESA failed to report language received from the customer that read as follows: "The Seller shall not supply goods or materials which have been manufactured or processed in Israel nor shall the services of any Israel organisation be used in handling or transporting the good or materials." Section 760.5 of the Antiboycott Regulations requires U.S. persons (which includes foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies) to report boycott requests to BIS's Office of Antiboycott Compliance. The charging letter and settlement agreement can be found at the following link.

Labels:

September 11, 2005 

U.S. and Saudi Arabia Complete Negotiations on WTO Accession

The U.S. and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have concluded bilateral negotiations on issues related to Saudi Arabia's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). In the agreement, Saudi Arabia pledged not to enforce the Arab boycott against U.S. companies that maintain trade relations with Israel (the secondary and tertiary aspects of the Arab boycott of Israel). In addition, Saudi Arabia agreed not to invoke the non-application provision of the WTO Agreement and thus will have WTO relations with all WTO members, including Israel.

Saudi Arabia has been negotiating the terms of its accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and then to the WTO, since 1993. The U.S. is the last WTO member formally to conclude a bilateral market access agreement with Saudi Arabia. The agreement with the U.S. and those Saudi Arabia concluded with other WTO members will be consolidated in a package that must be approved formally by WTO members and accepted by the government of Saudi Arabia.

A summary of the U.S.-Saudi Arabia agreement prepared by USTR can be found at the following link:
www.ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Fact_Sheets/2005/

asset_upload_file762_7935.pdf.

Labels:

March 31, 2005 

USTR Issues 2005 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has issued the 2005 version of the National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers (NTE), an annual report documenting foreign trade and investment barriers and U.S. efforts to reduce and eliminate those barriers. The NTE provides an account of barriers and unfair trade practices to American exports of goods, services and agricultural products. The NTE, which is required to be issued by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, is based upon information compiled by the USTR, the U.S. Departments of Commerce and Agriculture, and other U.S. Government agencies, and is supplemented with information provided in response to a Federal Register notice, and by members of the private sector trade advisory committees and U.S. Embassies abroad. The 2005 NTE report discusses the largest export markets for the United States, including 56 nations, the European Union (E.U.), Taiwan, Hong Kong, the Southern African Customs Union and the Arab League.

The NTE's chapter on the E.U., which is 49 pages in length, states that U.S. exporters in some sectors continue to face chronic barriers to entering the EU market. The report indicates that although the enlargement of the E.U. in May 2004 to include ten new countries represents an important and positive political and economic achievement, it has resulted in new tariff, non-tariff and services-related barriers to U.S. trade. In addition, the report notes that the systemic problems surrounding a lack of uniformity and transparency in the administration of E.U. customs law have assumed greater prominence in light of the addition to the E.U. of 10 new national customs authorities.

The NTE's chapter on the Arab League states that the Arab League's boycott of Israel remains a significant barrier to U.S. trade and investment in some countries in the Middle East and North Africa. The report indicates that enforcement of the boycott remains the responsibility of individual member states and enforcement efforts vary widely from country to country. For example, the report notes that Egypt, Jordan, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and the Palestinian Authority do not enforce the boycott.

With respect to Turkey, the report states that U.S. CE-marked products, particularly medical devices, are often detained by Turkish customs authorities for inspection. In some cases, U.S. products apparently have been subject to additional tests, despite their CE marks, while EU CE-marked products gain immediate entry to the Turkish market.

The USTR's 2005 NTE report can be found at the following link: www.ustr.gov/Document_Library/Reports_Publications/2005/2005_NTE_Report/Section_Index.html.

Labels:

December 17, 2004 

Treasury Department Issues Quarterly List of Boycotting Countries

The Treasury Department published in today's Federal Register its quarterly list of list of countries that may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott, as defined by section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Treasury has advised that the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott: Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Republic of Yemen.

This list of countries is unchanged from the last quarterly list published by Treasury on July 13, 2004.

Labels:

November 05, 2004 

U.S. Soybean Growers Warn of Possible Retaliation if U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duties on Shrimp

In an unusual development in the antidumping investigation on imported shrimp, American soybean growers have warned the U.S. government against imposing antidumping duties on shrimp imports from Asia, citing a threat from the region to retaliate by boycotting soybean imports.

In a recent letter to Secretary of Commerce Donald Evans,
the president of the American Soybean Association (ASA) said the outcome of the antidumping investigation on shrimp from Thailand, China, Vietnam and India could have "a direct and serious impact" on the U.S. soybean industry. Specifically, the ASA is concerned over a threat by nine private trade groups in Thailand, representing virtually all business consumers of U.S. soybean exports, that "have agreed to ban imports of soybeans and soybean meal" if the Commerce Department imposed antidumping duties on Thai shrimp. The ASA's letter also warned that the antidumping duties could lead to lost business by soybean farmers and exports of U.S. soybean products to other countries in Asia, including China.

The Southern Shrimp Alliance, comprised of U.S. shrimp producers, has called the boycott threat "economic terrorism" and advised the U.S. Government to ignore the demands of the U.S. soybean industry.

Labels:

October 07, 2004 

Treasury Issues Quarterly List of Boycotting Countries

On October 5, 2004, the Treasury Department published in the Federal Register its quarterly list of lcountries that may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott, as defined by section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Treasury has advised that the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott: Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Republic of Yemen.

While Iraq was removed from the list of boycotting countries in mid-2003, given that Iraq's sovereignty has been restored and reports of boycott requests being included in Iraqi Government tenders it is possible that Iraq will be returned to this list in the future. Thus, all transactions with Iraq and the other countries named above should be carefully reviewed for prohibited boycott language.


The Treasury Department's notice can be viewed at the following link:
a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06jun20041800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-22366.htm.

For a primer on dealing with boycott requests, see the following article that was published in the Export Practitioner: www.djacobsonlaw.com/documents/June02ExPrac.pdf.

Labels:

October 01, 2004 

BIS Announces Antiboycott Settlements

On September 30, 2004, the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Indutry and Security (BIS) announced the settlement of two cases involving violations of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

In the first case, St. Jude Medical Export GmbH, an Austrian subsidiary of a Minnesota-based U.S. exporter of medical equipment, agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it violated the antiboycott provisions of the EAR by failing to report in a timely manner its receipt of three requests from an Iraqi government agency to adhere to the rules of the Israeli boycott during the 2000-2001 reporting period. BIS also charged that, on four occasions, St. Jude violated the antiboycott provisions by agreeing to refuse to do business with blacklisted persons.

In the second case, Arab Bank Plc., of New York, agreed to pay a $9,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it violated the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by furnishing prohibited information about another company’s business relationships in connection with a transaction involving the sale of goods to Oman. BIS also charged that Arab Bank failed to maintain records relating to a reportable boycott request.

The antiboycott provisions of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain requirements of unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including providing information about business relationships with another person who is known or believed to be restricted from having a business relationship with or in a boycotting country. In addition, the EAR requires that U.S. persons report their receipt of certain boycott requests to the Department of Commerce. Under the antiboycott provisions of the EAR, a controlled-in-fact foreign subsidiary of a domestic U.S. company is considered a U.S. person.

Labels:

July 13, 2004 

Treasury Publishes Quarterly List of Boycotting Countries

The Treasury Department published in today's Federal Register its quarterly list of list of countries that may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott, as defined by section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Treasury has advised that the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott: Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Republic of Yemen.

While Iraq was removed from the list of boycotting countries in mid-2003, given that Iraq's sovereignty has recently been restored it is likely that Iraq will be returned to this list in the future. As a result, all transactions with Iraq and the other countries named above should be carefully reviewed for prohibited boycott language.

Labels:

May 17, 2004 

BIS Imposes $24,500 Penalty for Antiboycott Violations

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has imposed a $24,500 civil penalty on Input/Output Exploration Products (UK), Inc., the foreign subsidiary of a Texas-based U.S. manufacturer of seismic imaging technology, to settle charges that the company violated the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

In its charging letter, BIS alleged that in 1999 Input/Output Exploration Products (UK), Inc., violated the EAR when it provided answers to questions from a customer about its business with or in Israel and the business relationships of its parent company with or in Israel. BIS also charged that in 1999 Input/Output Exploration Products (UK), Inc. unlawfully agreed to refuse to do business with companies on lists maintained by Arab League countries that boycott Israel, and failed to report its receipt of boycott requests received in three transactions. The charges involved transactions with Syria, which the company voluntarily self-disclosed to BIS.

The antiboycott provisions of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain
requirements