International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | CIT Holds that Byrd Amendment Funds Not Applicable... » | BIS Publishes 2005 Annual Report » | CAFTA-DR Certificate of Origin Form » | ITC to Conduct Factfinding Investigation on U.S. T... » | Next NCITD Meeting to be Held on April 6, 2006 » | U.K. Imposes Fine on Company for Unlicensed Export... » | Legislation Introduced to Hire More CBP Import Spe... » | Goods From Honduras and Nicaragua now Eligible for... » | Secretary of Homeland Security Discusses Shipping ... » | USTR Issues 2006 National Trade Estimate Report on... » 

April 09, 2006 

DDTC Imposes Record Penalties on Boeing and Others for ITAR Violations

The Seattle Times reports on Boeing's recently completed $15 million settlement with the State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) for violating the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) by making unlicensed foreign sales of commercial aircraft containing the controlled QRS-11 gyrochip.

The article describes the commodity jurisdiction history of the QRS-11 and notes that the State Department had determined that the gyrochip was covered by the U.S. Munitions List as early as 1993. However, "Boeing continued the exports even after the State Department told the company to stop" and Boeing's "lawyers advised that the State Department 'did not have jurisdiction' to regulate the exports." The article quotes a Boeing spokesman as saying that "In hindsight, we should have handled it differently" and "we would handle it differently today."

Separately, DDTC also entered into a consent agreement with Goodrich Corporation and L-3 Communications imposing a $7 million penalty to settle alleged violations of the ITAR. Among other things, DDTC alleged that Goodrich and L-3, including L-3's subsidiary, L-3 Communications Avionics, Inc., formerly a subsidiary of Goodrich known as Goodrich Avionics Systems, Inc., violated the ITAR by omitting material facts from a commodity jurisdiction for a product containing QRS-11 gyrochips and making unauthorized exports of such products. Under the consent agreement, Goodrich will pay a civil penalty of $1,250,000 and L-3 will pay a civil penalty of $2,000,000. The remainder of the penalty will be spent on remedial compliance measures. Both companies are also required to appoint qualified individuals to serve as Special Compliance Officers for three years.

Labels: ,


Editor

Subscribe

Enter your e-mail address below to be notified of updates to International Trade Law News (privacy assured).

Powered by FeedBlitz (See Preview)

 Subscribe to RSS Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Search Trade Law News

International Trade Jobs

Archives

Import/Export Links