International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

April 30, 2005 

Iran's National Petrochemical Company Still Expects to Purchase Basell NV

According to today's most recent Reuters news report, Iran's National Petrochemical Company (NPC) still expects to purchase Basell NV from its current owners Royal/Dutch Shell Group and BASF AG. The article states that "Iran said it was better-placed to buy polymer joint venture Basell than its Indian rivals and expects to be the final winner in the sale process." The article quotes NPC's managing director as saying "from a contractual point of view, NPC is in good position and will be the final winner, but the decision rests with the shareholders."

U.S. companies and their foreign subsidiaries that purchase polypropylene, polyethylene and other products from Basell's U.S. or non-U.S. plants and/or purchase any parts, components or packaging materials made from polypropylene and polyethylene should determine the impact of Basell's sale to NPC, which is owned by the Government of Iran, on their operations. Specifically, U.S. companies should consider the broad reach of the Iranian Transactions Regulations (ITR) (31 CFR Part 560) on their international operations if Basell is sold to NPC.

April 29, 2005 

Senate Confirms Portman as USTR

The U.S. Senate early this morning confirmed Representative Robert Portman (R-OH) to be the next U.S. Trade Representative. The voice vote, which occurred shortly after midnight, followed Senator Evan Bayh's (D-IN) decision to drop his legislative on the nomination. Bayh agreed to drop his hold after receiving a promise that a hearing would be held on S. 593, the Stopping Overseas Subsidies (SOS) Act. That bill would amend Section 701(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671(a)(1)) to specify that the provisions relating to countervailing duties apply to nonmarket economy countries. The Department of Commerce considers China, Vietnam and Ukraine as nonmarket economy countries.

 

President Nominates New ITC Commissioner

President Bush has nominated Shara L. Aranoff to serve as a Commissioner of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to serve the remainder of a nine-year term expiring December 16, 2012. Once confirmed by the Senate, Ms. Aranoff will replace Commissioner Miller, whose term has expired. Ms. Aranoff currently serves as the Senior International Trade Counsel on the Democratic Staff of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee. She previously served as Attorney-Adviser in the Office of General Counsel at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Earlier in her career, Ms. Aranoff clerked for the Honorable Herbert P. Wilkins, Associate Justice, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. She received her bachelor's degree from Princeton University and her J.D. from Harvard Law School.

The ITC is comprised of six Commissioners who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. No more than three Commissioners may be of any one political party. The Commissioners serve overlapping terms of nine years each, with a new term beginning every 18 months.

 

U.S. Proceeds With Safeguards Proceeding on Textile Products From China

The U.S. Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) has agreed to consider requests submitted on behalf of a coalition of textile companies and a labor union representing textile and apparel workers for safeguard action limiting imports of seven categories of textile and apparel products from China. The seven categories are: (1) men's & boys' cotton & man-made fiber shirts, not knit (category 340/640); (2) cotton & man-made fiber sweaters (category 345/645/646); (3) cotton & man-made fiber brassieres (category 349/649); (4) cotton & man-made fiber dressing gowns (category 350/650); (5) man-made fiber knit shirts and blouses (category 638/639); (6) man-made fiber trousers (category 647/648); and (7) other synthetic filament fabric (category 620).

As a result of this determination, CITA will soon publish in the Federal Register a notice seeking public comments on whether the U.S. market for those products is disrupted, and, if so, the role of Chinese-origin products in that disruption. CITA will make a market disruption determination within 60 calendar days (which can be extended) after the conclusion of the public comment period. If CITA makes an affirmative determination that imports of Chinese textiles and apparel products are disrupting the U.S. market, the Committee will request consultations with China, with a view to easing or avoiding such market disruption. On the date consultations are requested by the U.S., a quota will be put in place to limit U.S. imports from China of those textile and apparel products with respect to which CITA has reached an affirmative determination of market disruption.

April 28, 2005 

Fallout Over InVision FCPA Violations Reverberates in Thailand

The fallout over InVision's recent settlement of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations in the U.S. in connection with a sale of bomb detection equipment to Bangkok's new airport has created an uproar in Thailand. The Nation, one of Thailand's leading newspapers, reports today that Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has tried to distance his government from the procurement scandal by announcing that a secret investigation he ordered late last year found that no officials in his administration had accepted bribes in relation to the deal. The paper also reports that Patriot Business Consultants, the Bangkok company at the heart of the airport scandal, has received a "large sum" of money for the supply of the explosives detectors, despite delays in their shipment. The Bangkok Post, also has weighed in on this issue and has called on the Prime Minister to launch an independent inquiry into bribery allegations, rather than allow the Ministry of Transportation to conduct its own investigation.

April 27, 2005 

BIS Publishes "Don't Let This Happen to You!"

The Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of Export Enforcement today published a new edition of their publication entitled "Don't Let This Happen to You!" Each chapter of the publication, which is in PDF format, covers a particular area of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), followed by examples of relevant actual criminal and administrative cases that resulted in fines, imprisonment, and/or denial of export privileges. The publication includes chapters on deemed exports, freight forwarders, antiboycott issues, successor liability and other provisions of the EAR.

The publication can be found at the following link:
www.bis.doc.gov/ComplianceAndEnforcement/Dont_Let_This_Happen_To_You_2005.pdf.

 

New U.S.-Cuba Trade Association Formed

A group of companies, state agencies and organizations have formed the U.S.-Cuba Trade Association (USCTA), whose mission is "to protect current trade with Cuba, expand and increase the potential for future business, and promote the full normalization of commercial relations between the U.S. and Cuba."

The Board of Directors of the USCTA is headed by Bill Reinsch, former Under Secretary of Commerce and current President of the National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC). The USCTA has formed a strategic partnership with the NFTC and its USA*Engage Coalition of more than 600 U.S. companies which have opposed the use of unilateral economic sanctions, including the Cuba embargo.

The USCTA has a distinguished Board of Advisors, chaired by William D. Rogers, former Assistant Secretary of State and a Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates.

More information on the USCTA, including a list of the members of the Board of Directors, Board of Advisors and membership information, can be found at www.uscuba.org.

April 26, 2005 

Parrlab Technical Solutions Added to BIS Unverified List

Today the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a notice in the Federal Register adding Parrlab Technical Solutions, Ltd., located at 1204, 12F Shanghai Industrial Building, 48-62 Hennesey Road in Wan Chai, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, to the Unverified List. A "red flag" now exists for transactions involving Parrlab Technical Solutions, Ltd. due to its inclusion on the Unverified List. As a result, exporters have an affirmative duty to inquire, verify, or otherwise substantiate the proposed transaction to satisfy themselves that the transaction does not involve a proliferation activity prohibited in 15 CFR part 744, and does not violate other provisions of the EAR.

 

Senate Finance Committee Unanimously Votes to Confirm New USTR

The Senate Finance Committee today unanimously approved the nomination of U.S. Representative Rob Portman (R-OH) to serve as the next U.S. Trade Representative. As previously reported, however, Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) has placed a hold on the full Senate vote until the Senate leadership schedules a vote on S. 593, the Stopping Overseas Subsidies (SOS) Act.

 

OFAC Adds Global Arms-Trafficking Network to SDN List

The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) today added the names of 30 companies and four individiuals to the list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN List) that are believed to be linked to international arms dealer Victor Bout. The U.S. government claims that Bout runs a network of air cargo companies that are based in various countries in the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe and the U.S. In addition, Bout is said to control what is reputed to be the largest private fleet of Soviet-era cargo aircraft in the world.

OFAC's action was taken under the authority of
Executive Order 13348 which allows the U.S. government to block the assets of people connected to former Liberian President Charles Taylor. Bout was designated as a SDN in July 2004 because of his association with Taylor. Today's action not only blocks any U.S. bank accounts and other financial assets belonging to these companies and persons in the U.S. but also prohibits U.S. persons and companies from engaging in any transactions with them. Several of the companies added to the SDN list are located in Richardson, Texas, a Dallas suburb. The U.S. will submit the names of the 30 companies and four individuals to the U.N. Sanctions Committee established by U.N. Security Council Resolution 1521, which will consider adding them to the consolidated list of individuals and entities tied to Taylor. The complete list of the 34 new SDNs can be found at the following link:
www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/actions/
20050426.shtmlwww.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/.

April 25, 2005 

Commercial Spaceflight Industry Facing Export Control Issues

The Space Review has published an article describing the export control-related issues that were raised at last week's hearing on the future markets for commercial space operations held by the House Science Committee's Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. The hearing featured testimony by Burt Rutan, famed aircraft and spacecraft designer and founder of Scaled Composites LLC, and Will Whitehorn, president of Virgin Galactic, the personal spaceflight company founded by Richard Branson.

During the hearing, it was noted that suborbital vehicle developers and operators of personal spacecraft are facing significant regulatory burdens imposed by the U.S., including barriers imposed by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). In his testimony to the subcommittee, Will Whitehorn indicated that uncertainty about possible licensing requirements has prevented Virgin Galactic from viewing Scaled Composites' designs for the commercial space vehicle that it intends to use, known as SpaceShipTwo. He also indicated the delays have prevented Virgin Galactic from placing a formal order with Scaled Composites for the vehicles.

Elon Musk, CEO and Chief Technology Officer of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX), also expressed concerns about U.S. export controls and stated that "we really need to do something about ITAR. It is really hurting U.S. industry."

Former subcomittee chairman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) noted that revisions to U.S. export control regulations are in order and that streamlined regulations are needed for close U.S. allies, such as the U.K. Current subcommittee chairman Ken Calvert (R-CA) promised to work with Rohrabacher to achieve "some streamlining to make this process work" more smoothly.

The prepared testimony presented by Rutan, Whitehorn, Musk and others at the hearing can be found at the following link:
www.house.gov/science/hearings/space05/Apr20/index.htm.

April 24, 2005 

This Week at the U.S. International Trade Commission (April 25 through April 29, 2005)

April 25, 2005: No meetings hearings or votes scheduled.

April 26, 2005: Commission Hearing in Five-year (sunset) reviews: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-381-382 and 731-TA-797-804 (Review), 9:30 a.m. in ITC Main Hearing Room (500 E Street SW).

April 27, 2005: No meetings hearings or votes scheduled.

April 28, 2005:

Commission Vote in Five-year (sunset) review: Sebacic Acid from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-653 (Second Review), 11:00 a.m. in ITC Main Hearing Room (500 E Street SW).

Report Due to Requester -- Economic effects investigation: Effect of Modifications to the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, Inv. No. Morocco FTA-103-11 is due to the U.S. Trade
Representative.

April 29, 2005: No meetings hearings or votes scheduled.

 

U.S. Designates Two Latvian Banks as Money Laundering Entities

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has designated two Latvian financial institutions, Multibanka and VEF Bank, as "primary money laundering concerns" under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act for money-laundering activities and financial abuse. As a result of this designation, the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) will publish a Notice of Proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register on April 26, 2005 that, when finalized, will prohibit U.S. financial institutions from establishing, maintaining, administering or managing any correspondent account in the U.S. for or on behalf of these two banks.

Headquartered in Riga, Multibanka is the oldest commercial bank in Latvia. Multibanka has four foreign offices (Russia, Ukraine and Belarus), five domestic branches and one leasing subsidiary called Multilizings. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking identifies several reasons for the designation of Multibanka as a primary money laundering concern:

-- Multibanka offers confidential banking services and numbered accounts for non-Latvian customers. Reports substantiate that a significant portion of its business involves wiring money out of the country on behalf of its accountholders.

-- Information available to the U.S. Government shows Multibanka has been used by Russian and other shell companies to facilitate financial crime by allowing criminals to disguise illegal proceeds in countries known for lax enforcement of anti-money laundering laws.

-- According to information available to the U.S. Government, certain criminals use accounts at Multibanka to facilitate financial fraud schemes. Specifically, an individual involved in financial fraud reported carrying out large sum transactions through his account at Multibanka. In addition, an individual arrested in 2004 for his involvement in an access device fraud ring used an account at Multibanka to launder proceeds of his criminal activities.

VEF, with headquarters in Riga, is one of the smallest of Latvia's 23 banks. It has one subsidiary, Veiksmes lîzings, which offers financial leasing and factoring services. In addition to its headquarters in Riga, VEF has one branch in Riga, and one representative office in the Czech Republic. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued today identifies several reasons for the designation of VEF Bank as a primary money laundering concern:

-- VEF Bank lacks adequate controls and procedures to detect and combat money laundering. These deficiencies, coupled with the bank's dealings with foreign shell companies and provision of confidential banking services, make VEF vulnerable to money laundering and other financial crimes.

-- VEF Bank offers confidential banking services for non-Latvian customers. Less than 20 percent of these deposits are from individuals or companies located in Latvia, an indicator that a bank may be used to launder money.

To date, the Treasury Department has previously identified the following financial institutions as "primary money laundering concerns," pursuant to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act:

-- The First Merchant Bank of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" ("TRNC") and Infobank of Belarus in August 2004;

-- The Commercial Bank of Syria and its subsidiary Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank in May 2004; and

-- Myanmar Mayflower Bank and Asia Wealth Bank in November 2003.

Labels:

April 21, 2005 

Article Describes Effect of Payment of OFAC's New Payment of Cash In Advance Regulation

The business section of today's Washington Times contains an article describing the impact of OFAC's recent "clarification" of the term "payment by cash in advance" for sales of licensed agricultural products to Cuba. The article describes the plight of a Massachusetts company whose exports of eggs to Cuba were rising until the new regulation went into effect. Now, the company has no pending orders. The article also correctly notes that while the OFAC regulation makes it more difficult to sell licensed agricultural products to Cuba it does not necessarily prohibit U.S. exporters from engaging in transactions with Cuba.

The entire article can be viewed at the following link:
http://washingtontimes.com/business/20050420-093237-1177r.htm

 

Senate Finance Committee Holds Hearing on Nomination of USTR-Designee Portman

The Senate Finance Committee today held a hearing on the nomination of U.S. Trade Representative-designee Congressman Robert Portman (R-OH). Much of the hearing focused on U.S. trade policy with China and Portman told the members of the Finance Committee that the U.S. needs "a tougher approach" to China. He indicated that once he is confirmed he will order a "top to bottom review" of the various trade complaints against China and would make a trip to China to deliver his message to the Government of China.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) indicated that his committee will vote on Portman's nomination next week. However, as previously reported in International Trade Law News, Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) has placed a procedural hold on the vote until until the Senate leadership schedules a vote on S. 593, the Stopping Overseas Subsidies (SOS) Act. S. 593 would apply the countervailing duty laws to nonmarket economy countries, including China. Senator Voinovich (R-OH), a co-sponsor of S. 593, is trying to convince Senator Bayh that it is not in the best interests of their cause to block Portman's confirmation.

Representative Portman's prepared testimony presented at today's hearing can be found at the following link:
finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/2005test/rptest042105.pdf.

April 19, 2005 

ITC Issues Negative Final Injury Determinations on AD and CVD Investigations on PET Resin

On April 18, 2005, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued negative injury determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on bottle-grade Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India, Indonesia and Thailand (Investigations Nos. 701-TA-439 and 731-TA-1077, 1078 and 1080 (Final)). By a 5-1 vote, the ITC Commissioners determined that a U.S. industry is not materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin from India that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are subsidized and imports of this product from India, Indonesia, and Thailand that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. Chairman Stephen Koplan, Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, and Commissioners Jennifer A. Hillman, Charlotte R. Lane, and Daniel R. Pearson voted in the negative. Commissioner Marcia E. Miller voted in the affirmative. As a result of the Commission's negative determinations, no countervailing duty or antidumping duty orders on imports of this product from India, Indonesia and Thailand will be issued.

The antidumping and countervailing petitions that launched this case were field by the U.S. PET Resin Producers' Coalition, consisting of DAK Americas, LLC, Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Voridian, a division of Eastman Chemical Company and Wellman, Inc.

April 17, 2005 

FinCEN Issues New Edition of the SAR Review

The Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published on April 15, 2005 the eighth edition of The SAR Activity Review – Trends, Tips & Issues (the "SAR Review"). The SAR Review, which examines and analyzes Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed under the Bank Secrecy Act, has been redesigned and will now be published three times per year. The current edition of the SAR Review contains a message from FinCEN's Director discussing the steps the agency is taking to address the need for greater clarity and consistency in the application of the suspicious activity reporting regulation. In addition, the SAR Review provides a detailed discussion of SARs related to terrorist financing and SARs filing trends in one facet of the casino and card club industry. The SAR Review also contains a summary of SARs used in criminal investigations, tips on SARs form preparation and filing and an overview of the recently issued guidance for filing SARs when also reporting under the Office of Foreign Assets Control List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.

The current edition of the SAR Review is available on FinCEN’s website at www.fincen.gov/sarreviewissue8.pdf.

Labels:

 

This Week at the U.S. International Trade Commission (April 18 through April 22, 2005)

April 18, 2005: No meetings, hearings or votes scheduled.


April 19, 2005:

Co
mmission Vote -- Final phase antidumping investigations on PET Resin from India, Indonesia and Thailand (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-439 and 731-TA-1077, 1078, and 1080 (Final)), 9:30 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room

Commission Hearing -- Renewable Energy Services: An Examination of U.S. and Foreign Markets (Inv. No. 332-462), 9:45 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

April 20 and 21, 2005: No meetings, hearings or votes scheduled.

April 22, 2005: Preliminary Conference -- Preliminary phase antidumping investigation on Artists' Canvas from China (Inv. No. 731-TA-1091 (Preliminary)), 9:30 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

 

This Week at the U.S. International Trade Commission (April 18 through April 22, 2005)

April 18, 2005: No meetings, hearings or votes scheduled.


April 19, 2005:
Commission Vote -- Final phase antidumping investigations on PET Resin from India, Indonesia and Thailand (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-439 and 731-TA-1077, 1078, and 1080 (Final)), 9:30 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room
Commission Hearing -- Renewable Energy Services: An Examination of U.S. and Foreign Markets (Inv. No. 332-462), 9:45 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

April 20 and 21, 2005: No meetings, hearings or votes scheduled.

April 22, 2005: Preliminary Conference -- Preliminary phase antidumping investigation on Artists' Canvas from China (Inv. No. 731-TA-1091 (Preliminary)), 9:30 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

April 13, 2005 

Third Circuit Reinstates Conviction of Businessman Found Guilty of Engaging in Illegal Trade With Cuba

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit today reinstated the conviction of Stefan Brodie, a Philadelphia-area businessman who was found guilty by a jury in 2002 of conspiring to violate the U.S. embargo on Cuban, but then was acquitted by the trial judge.

By way of background, in October 2000, following an investigation that lasted nearly five years, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania indicted Bro-Tech Corp., a Delaware corporation that trades under the name "The Purolite Company", of making illegal sales of ion exchange resins to Cuba. Ion exchange resins are used for water and waste water treatment. Also indicted were Stefan Brodie, the company's co-owner, president and CEO, Stefan's brother Don Brodie, the company's co-owner and executive vice-president and James Sabzali, a Canadian citizen and the company's sales manager and director of marketing. Each of them was indicted on one count of conspiracy to violate the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 ("TWEA") and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations ("CACRs") and 75 counts of substantive violations of TWEA and the CACRs. See Forbidden Trade, The U.S. Hard Line on Exports to Cuba (The Export Practitioner Nov. 2002).


The indictments alleged that during much of the 1990s, Bro-Tech sold ion exchange resins to Cuba through intermediary companies in Canada, Mexico and Europe. The indictment also alleged that several U.S. based employees of Bro-Tech were aware of and facilitated such sales and that several Canadian Bro-Tech employees, including James Sabzali, were reimbursed for their business-related travel to Cuba by staff located in the company's Pennsylvania headquarters. During the three-week trial held before Judge Mary A. McLaughlin in 2002, the prosecution and defense focused on whether the defendants had "knowingly" and "willingly" violated the provisions of U.S. law that prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in or facilitating the unlicensed sales of goods to Cuba.

The jury agreed with much of the government's case and convicted Bro-Tech of 45 counts of violating TWEA, Sabzali of 21 counts, Donald Brodie of 34 counts and Stefan Brodie of one count of conspiracy to violate TWEA. Sabzali's convictions were on counts relating to his role in certain sales to Cuba and his approval of reimbursements to a Canadian salesman for travel expenses to, from, and within Cuba. Donald Brodie's convictions arose from his "causing" and "approving" certain Cuban sales, and reimbursing employees for travel to Cuba, while in the United States.


As detailed in New Trials Ordered for Defendants Convicted for Illegal Sales to Cuba (The Export Practitioner August 2003), the trial judge granted all
four defendants a new trial on the ground that the government had made certain improper and inflammatory comments and argument during its opening and closing statements which prejudiced the jury. Subsequently, the government entered into a plea bargain with three of the defendants. Don Brodie pleaded guilty to one count of the indictment (involving his approval of expenditures in the amount of $4,187 for Mr. Sabzali's Cuba-related travel) and was sentenced to one year probation and fined $10,000. The Bro-Tech Corporation also pleaded guilty to one count, and was fined $250,000. Mr. Sabzali pleaded guilty to a superceding information charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2 (aiding and abetting) and
18 U.S.C. section 545 (smuggling goods into the United States), and was sentenced to one year probation and fined $10,000.

In reviewing Stefan Brodie's motion for judgment of acquittal, Judge McLaughlin noted that the court must determine whether, "upon the evidence, giving full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility, weigh the evidence, and draw justifiable inferences of fact, a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." The trial judge also noted that "the question the Court must answer is whether a rational jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to violate TWEA and the CACRs." In reviewing the evidence presented at trial, the trial judge found that very little evidence presented by the government during the six days of its case-in-chief related to Stefan Brodie. The judge also found that there was no direct evidence presented demonstrating his involvement in any of the sales or reimbursements of expenses alleged in the indictment. As a result, the trial judge found that there was insufficient evidence of Stefan Brodie's knowing and willful participation in the charged conspiracy and therefore granted the motion for acquittal. See United States v. Brodie, 268 F. Supp. 2d 408 (E.D. Pa. 2002).

The U.S. government appealed the trial judge's decision to grant Stefan Brodie's motion for judgment of acquittal to the Third Circuit. After reviewing the evidence presented during the trial in detail, the Third Circuit held that "we are satisfied that a reasonable jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant had actual knowledge of the law violated, the facts constituting the offense and the illicit purpose of the conspiracy." The Court also concluded "that a reasonable jury could find the knowledge requirements of the crime met on a theory of willful blindness" and found that the evidence presented during the trial "paints a convincing picture of the Defendant as a company president who deliberately stuck his head in the sand regarding the involvement of the U.S. entity in the prohibited transactions."

In the opinion's conclusion, the Third Circuit's noted that "deciding a motion for judgment of acquittal in a conspiracy case built entirely on circumstantial evidence is not an easy task, and was made all the more difficult in this case by the complexities of the underlying substantive law and voluminous record." However, after reviewing the government's evidence against Stefan Brodie, the Third Circuit found that the trial judge erred in entering the judgment of acquittal and reinstated the jury's guilty verdict.

This must-read opinion, which contains a very detailed account of the evidence presented at trial regarding the efforts that Bro-Tech and its senior executives took to sell its products to Cuba, can be found at the following link:
www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/022662p.pdf.

 

Senator Bayh Places Hold on USTR Nomination Vote

Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) has placed a hold on the Senate vote of Representative Rob Portman (R-OH), the President's nominee to be the U.S. Trade Representative, until Republican leaders schedule a vote on his bill aimed at countering subsidies in nonmarket economies. Senator Bayh has said that he does not oppose Congressman Portman's nomination to be USTR and will release the hold if a vote is scheduled on S. 593, the Stopping Overseas Subsidies (SOS) Act. A companion bill to the SOS Act, H. R. 1216, has been introduced in the House.

S. 593 and H.R. 1216 would amend Section 701(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671(a)(1)) to specify that the provisions relating to countervailing duties apply to nonmarket economy countries. The bill is a legislative effort to overturn the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's 1986 decision in Georgetown Steel Corp. v. United States, 801 F.2d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 1986), which held that the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) could not apply countervailing duty laws to countries designated as a "nonmarket economy." Currently, DOC treats China, Vietnam and Ukraine as nonmarket economy countries.

 

BIG Announces Settlement of Two Export Enforcement Cases

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) today issued a press release announcing that Carl Zeiss Optical, Inc. (Zeiss), of Chester, Virginia, has agreed to pay a $10,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it illegally exported optical sighting devices from the U.S. to Canada in violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). In its charging letter, BIS alleged that, on ten occasions between June 7, 2002 and April 23, 2003, Zeiss exported riflescopes from the U.S. to Canada, without obtaining the required export licenses.

Today BIS also issued a press release announcing that Yarde Metals (Yarde) of Happauge, New York, has agreed to pay a $10,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it violated the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in connection with the unlicensed export of an aluminum plate to an organization in India included on the Entity List. As previously detailed last month in International Trade Law News, BIS alleged that in May 2003, Yarde exported an aluminum plate from the U.S. to the Vikram Sarabhai Space Center (VSSC) in India without the required license. At the time of the export, VSSC, a sub-entity of the Indian Space Research Organization, was on the Entity List due to missile proliferation concerns.

 

CBP Increases Interest Rates Used to Calculate Interest on Overpayments and Underpayments of Customs Duties

U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced in today's Federal Register that, effective April 1, 2005, it is increasing the interest rate used to calculate interest on overdue accounts (underpayments) and refunds (overpayments) of customs duties by one percent.

The following is a summary of the new interest rates for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2005:

--Underpayments = 6%
--Corporate overpayments = 5%
--Non-corporate overpayments = 6%.

The notice published by CBP, which lists the interest rates used since 1974, can be found at the following link:
a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-7444.htm

April 12, 2005 

USTR Seeks Comments on Non-Uniform Administration of EU Customs Laws

In connection with the WTO's recent decision to establish a dispute settlement panel regarding the non-uniform administration of customs laws by the European Union, the Office of the U.S. Trade Reprsentative (USTR) has published a notice in the Federal Register seeking public comments on the issues raised in the dispute. Comments must be submitted to USTR by May 2, 2005. The notice can be found at the following link:http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/05-7144.pdf


April 11, 2005 

This week at the U.S. International Trade Commission (April 11-15, 2005)

April 11, 12, 13: No meetings, hearings or votes scheduled.

April 14, 2005: Commission Vote -- Five-year (sunset) reviews: Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from Brazil, Japan, and Russia, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-384 and 731-TA-806-808 (Review), 11:00 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

April 15, 2005: Commission Vote -- Preliminary phase antidumping investigation: Superalloy Degassed Chromium from Japan, Inv. No. 731-TA-1090 (Preliminary), 11:00 a.m., ITC Main Hearing Room.

April 10, 2005 

House Committees to Hold Joint Hearing on E.U. Lifting of Arms Embargo on China

The House Committees on International Relations and Armed Services will hold a joint hearing on European Union's lifting of its arms embargo on China on April 14, 2005 at 9 a.m. in room 2118 of the Rayburn House Office Building. The hearing, which will focus on the national security and foreign policy implications for the U.S. if the E.U. lifts its arms embargo on China, will feature senior officials from the Departments of State, Defense and Commerce. As of this writing, the witnesses for the hearing have not been named.

Separately, on April 14, 2005 the House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing on U.S.-China Economic Relations and China's Role in the World Economy at 11:00 a.m. in room 1100 of the Longworth House Office Building. The hearing will focus on the following topics: (1) China's progress and U.S. response in the implementation of China's WTO accession commitments (including issues relating to China's enforcement of intellectual property rights, use of subsidies, and the use of non-tariff barriers such as standards and import licensing that affect imports); (2) trade relations between the U.S. and China; (3) China's currency management and other macroeconomic issues; and (4) the relationship between trade with China and the U.S. economy, particularly the manufacturing sector.

 

Markup of Iran Freedom Support Act Will Take Place on April 13, 2005

The House International Relations Subcommittee on Middle East and Central Asia's markup of H.R. 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, has been rescheduled. The markup will take place on April 13, 2005 at 12 noon in Room 2255 of the Rayburn House Office Building.

 

CBP Revises Importer-Self Assessment Program Documents

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has modified some of the documents associated with the Importer Self-Assessment (ISA) Program. Specifically, CBP has modified the ISA Handbook, ISA Memorandum of Understanding, ISA Annual Notification Letter and Guidance on Internal Controls for ISA. Links to these revised documents can be found on CBP's ISA Web site at www.customs.gov/xp/cgov/import/
regulatory_audit_program/importer_self_assessment/
.

 

Canadian Pork Producers Making Efforts to Prevent Future AD and CVD Cases From Being Filed

As a result of the U.S. International Trade Commission's recent negative antidumping injury determination on live swine from Canada, the Canadian pork industry is pledging to improve relations between Canadian and U.S. pork producers in an effort to avoid similar antidumping and countervailing duty petitions from being filed by the U.S. pork industry in the future.

April 08, 2005 

GAO Report Criticizes U.S. Textiles Safeguard Procedures

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report stating that procedural shortcomings have impeded U.S. textile producers from taking full advantage of the textile safeguard provisions the United States negotiated as part of China's World Trade Organization (WTO) accession agreement. The report entitled U.S.-China Trade: Textile Safeguard Procedures Should be Improved, resulted from a request included in the House-Senate conference report on fiscal year 2004 appropriations legislation asking the GAO to monitor and report on the efforts of U.S. government agencies responsible for ensuring free and fair trade with China.

The report explains the terms of the China textile safeguard, summarizes the context and results of requests for safeguard action that have been filed by U.S. domestic textile and apparel producers, and evaluates U.S. government agencies' procedures for access to the safeguard provision.

GAO investigators found that the multi-agency Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) had been slow to issue procedural guidelines for applying the China textile safeguard. When finally issued, the procedures focused primarily on cases involving actual disruption of markets, but neglected to provide clear guidance on so-called "threat-based" requests for safeguard action. The report urges improvements in implementation procedures. The GAO found that another shortcoming of the procedures is that they require safeguard requests to include specific market-share and production data. However, because the U.S. government lacks production data on about half of the total value of textile and apparel imports from China U.S. producers are forced to collect their own data, a process that further impedes access to the safeguard procedures for many U.S. producers.

The GAO report submitted two recommendations to CITA as a result of its study: it urged CITA to clarify its procedures for threat-based cases and to increase availability of required production data.

The GAO's report can be found at the following link: www.gao.gov/new.items/d05296.pdf.

 

U.S. Announces Indictment and Guilty Plea in Scheme to Export Oscilloscopes and Triggered Spark Gaps

A multiagency task force, including the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, today announced that it had obtained an indictment and a guilty plea against two individuals involved in a conspiracy to export unlicensed oscilloscopes and triggered spark gaps.

First, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment charging Humayun A. Khan, 47, of Islamabad, Pakistan, with conspiring to violate and, on three separate occasions, violating U.S. export restrictions on commodities that are controlled for nuclear non-proliferation reasons. The indictment alleges that Khan violated the federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. section 371, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"), 50 U.S.C. sections 1701-1706. According to the U.S. Attorney, Khan faces a maximum period of incarceration of 35 years under the statute and a likely range of 78 to 97 months in prison under the federal sentencing guidelines if he is convicted of these crimes.

In addition, the U.S. Government also announced the unsealing of the guilty plea of Asher Karni, an Israeli national residing in Capetown, South Africa, before his arrest in 2004, to a five count Information charging him with conspiracy and export violations arising out of his unlawful exports to Pakistan and India of U.S. origin commodities that are controlled for nuclear non-proliferation reasons.

According to the indictment, Khan was the owner and chief executive officer of an Islamabad, Pakistan, business known as Pakland PME Corporation. Sometime around August 2002, he approached Asher Karni, an Israeli national then residing in Cape Town, South Africa, and inquired whether Karni would help him acquire certain models of oscilloscopes manufactured by Tektronix, Inc., of Beaverton, Oregon. Because these particular models of oscilloscopes have applications in the testing and development of nuclear weapons and missile delivery systems, the Department of Commerce requires anyone seeking to export them to certain countries, including Pakistan, to obtain a license. The indictment claims that Khan, who was an authorized distributor for Tektronix in Pakistan, was aware of that licensing requirement. Karni was the owner of a firm in Cape Town, South Africa, known as Top-Cape Technology. The indictment claims that he agreed to assist Khan in obtaining the Tektronix oscilloscopes, even though Khan told him that they were subject to U.S. export controls and warned him not to disclose the true destination of the products.

In March 2003, Karni obtained one of the models of controlled oscilloscopes from a firm in Plainview, New York. He directed that the firm send the oscilloscope to Top-Cape in Cape Town, South Africa. Shortly after its arrival in South Africa, Karni re-exported the product to a company in Pakistan that Khan had designated. At no time during this transaction did either Karni or Khan obtain a license from the Department of Commerce for this export to Pakistan. In August 2003, Karni acquired two additional controlled Tektronix oscilloscopes in the United States and diverted them to a Khan customer in Pakistan through South Africa without obtaining the necessary license. In addition, throughout 2003, Karni and Khan worked to fill a $1.3 million order for controlled Tektronix oscilloscopes for a third Khan client in Pakistan.

In June 2003, Khan sent an e-mail to Karni asking him to purchase triggered spark gaps for a customer in Pakistan. Triggered spark gaps are high speed electrical switches that are often used in a medical device known as a lithotripter, which doctors utilize in treating kidney stones. Triggered spark gaps also have military applications. One such application is as a detonator for nuclear weapons. Exports of triggered spark gaps to South Africa, unlike Pakistan, are not prohibited.

The triggered spark gaps that Khan sought were manufactured by Perkin Elmer Optoelectronics of Salem, Massachusetts ("Perkin Elmer"). At Khan's direction, Karni first made inquiries of Perkin Elmer's French sales representative. The sales representative quoted Karni a price, but also advised him that the spark gaps required a U.S. export license and that Karni needed to certify both that the product would remain in South Africa and that it would not be used for any nuclear purposes. Karni forwarded this information to Khan and initially declined to pursue the order. Khan, however, prevailed upon Karni to continue to find a source for the triggered spark gaps.

In July 2003, an anonymous source informed agents of the Office of Export Enforcement ("OEE") of the Department of Commerce and Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") of the Department of Homeland Security that Karni was in the process of using a broker in Secaucus, New Jersey, to obtain 200 PerkinElmer triggered spark gaps for ultimate shipment to Pakistan through South Africa. The agents approached Perkin Elmer, which agreed to cooperate in the investigation and to render inoperable the triggered spark gaps that the New Jersey broker was in the process of ordering.

In October 2003, the OEE and ICE agents were able to track the first installment of 66 triggered spark gaps as the package traveled from the United States to Top-Cape in South Africa and then on to Pakistan through the United Arab Emirates. On December 11, 2003, OEE and ICE agents searched the offices in New Jersey of the broker that Karni was using to acquire the triggered spark gaps. Simultaneously, in coordination with U.S. authorities, members of the South African Police Service executed a search warrant at Karni's office in Cape Town, South Africa, which led to the seizure of emails and documents that furthered this investigation.

On January 1, 2004, agents arrested Karni as he entered the United States at Denver International Airport. On September 14, 2004, he pled guilty under seal to five federal felonies, including conspiracy to export controlled nuclear technology items to Pakistan. He also agreed to cooperate with the on-going investigation.

The press release announcing the indictment and guilty plea in this case can be found at: www.bis.doc.gov/News/2005/khan_pressrelease.pdf.

 

U.S. ITC to Conduct Investigation on Impact of Three Recently Implemented Free Trade Agreements

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will conduct an investigation on the impact of three trade agreements signed since 2002 under trade promotion authority (commonly known as "fast track").

The investigation, The Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Promotion Authority, is required by the Trade Act of 2002. The ITC will review and analyze the economic impact on the United States of the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement and the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement. The ITC will submit the report to Congress by June 1, 2005.

The ITC is seeking input for the investigation from all interested parties. The ITC will hold a public hearing in connection with the investigation on April 27, 2005. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed with the Secretary of the ITC no later than 5:15 p.m. on April 20, 2005.

April 06, 2005 

U.S. Textile Industry Files Petitions Seeking Additional Safeguards From Chinese Textile Imports

The U.S. textile and clothing industry today filed petitions with the Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements seeking the imposition of safeguard quotas on 14 categories of clothing made in China. The cases cover knit shirts, sweaters, brassieres, dressing gowns and trousers made with man-made fibers. These petitions come only two days after the Bush Administration self-initiated safeguard investigations on four categories of apparel products from China.

Separately, the European Commission today published guidelines that will clarify under what circumstances the E.U. would consider imposing safeguard actions against textile and clothing imports from China. The guidelines relate to the textiles-specific safeguard clause written into China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO in 2001 which was incorporated into E.U. law in 2003.

The E.U.'s safeguard guidelines establish procedures and criteria for the objective and transparent use of safeguard proceedings. The guidelines establish alert zones for each category of Chinese textiles imports allowing for increases in China's current market share. To reach these alert zones Chinese exports will need to show a rapid and sustained rise over a defined period. If these thresholds are reached, the Commission, acting on its own initiative or at the request of a Member State, will undertake an investigation. Informal consultations with the Chinese will allow China to act to provide sufficient remedy. If no remedy is achieved, formal WTO consultations with the Chinese authorities would require them to act to limit textiles exports in the affected categories. If this is still insufficient, safeguards can be invoked. Safeguards would take the form of quantitative import restrictions applicable for a year, but extendable on reapplication. The guidelines also allow for emergency procedures in the case of a rise in imports of such magnitude that serious material injury to E.U. industry is imminent. In this case formal consultation with the Chinese could be launched without a preceding investigation.

 

Two Sanctions Related Congressional Hearings Postponed

The House International Relations Subcommittee on Middle East and Central Asia's April 7, 2005 markup of H.R. 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, has been postponed. Subcommittee Chairperson Representative Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) will be traveling to Rome for the Pope's funeral.

Separately, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has postponed the April 12, 2005 hearing on U.S. agricultural sales to Cuba. There are currently efforts underway in the Senate to included the language that would clarify the payment terms for agricultural sales to Cuba as an amendment to S.600, the State Department and foreign assistance appropriations bill.

 

U.S. International Trade Commission Makes Negative Injury Determination in Antidumping Investigation of Live Swine From Canada

By a 5-0 vote, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today made a final negative injury determination in the antidumping investigation on live swine from Canada. Chairman Stephen Koplan, Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, and Commissioners Marcia E. Miller, Jennifer A. Hillman, and Charlotte R. Lane voted in the negative. Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson did not participate in this investigation. As a result of the ITC's negative determination, no antidumping duty order will be issued. Last month, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) made an affirmative final less-than-fair-value determination, calculating dumping margins up to 18% on Canadian hog imports. At the same time, DOC made a negative determination in the parallel countervailing duty investigation, finding no subsidies were paid to the Canadian producers.

The petitions requesting these investigations were filed by The Illinois Pork Producers Association, the Indiana Pork Advocacy Coalition, the Iowa Pork Producers Association, the Minnesota Pork Producers Association, the Missouri Pork Association, the Nebraska Pork Producers Association, Inc., the North Carolina Pork Council, Inc., the Ohio Pork Producers Council, and 119 individual producers of live swine.

Canadian pork producers are in Hog Heaven about today's ITC vote. The Pork Trade Action Coalition (PTAC) issued a statement saying that today's International Trade Commission (ITC) vote that live swine imports from Canada have not injured the U.S. domestic market is good news for both American and Canadian farmers and will help strengthen the North American hog market.