International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Midway Arms Inc. Settles Charges of Illegal Export... » | Commerce Department Revokes Antidumping Duty Order... » | BIS Issues Frequently Asked Questions on Changes t... » | ITC Makes Negative Injury Determination in Antidum... » | Robert Werner Named as Director of OFAC » | Meetings During BIS and Customs Law Updates » | BIS Requests Comments on Foreign-Policy Based Expo... » | BIS Requests Comments on Effectiveness of TSRA Lic... » | DOC Issues Preliminary Results of Antidumping Inve... » | USA*Engage and National Foreign Trade Council Issu... » 

October 01, 2004 

BIS Announces Antiboycott Settlements

On September 30, 2004, the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Indutry and Security (BIS) announced the settlement of two cases involving violations of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

In the first case, St. Jude Medical Export GmbH, an Austrian subsidiary of a Minnesota-based U.S. exporter of medical equipment, agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it violated the antiboycott provisions of the EAR by failing to report in a timely manner its receipt of three requests from an Iraqi government agency to adhere to the rules of the Israeli boycott during the 2000-2001 reporting period. BIS also charged that, on four occasions, St. Jude violated the antiboycott provisions by agreeing to refuse to do business with blacklisted persons.

In the second case, Arab Bank Plc., of New York, agreed to pay a $9,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it violated the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by furnishing prohibited information about another company’s business relationships in connection with a transaction involving the sale of goods to Oman. BIS also charged that Arab Bank failed to maintain records relating to a reportable boycott request.

The antiboycott provisions of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain requirements of unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including providing information about business relationships with another person who is known or believed to be restricted from having a business relationship with or in a boycotting country. In addition, the EAR requires that U.S. persons report their receipt of certain boycott requests to the Department of Commerce. Under the antiboycott provisions of the EAR, a controlled-in-fact foreign subsidiary of a domestic U.S. company is considered a U.S. person.

Labels:


Editor

Subscribe

Enter your e-mail address below to be notified of updates to International Trade Law News (privacy assured).

Powered by FeedBlitz (See Preview)

Search Trade Law News

International Trade Jobs

Archives

Site Feeds and Bookmarks

Import/Export Links